New 4 stroke engine (en anglais)

[inventor]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJ3Pohh502E
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AW1Fedhx6Nc

Regards Andrew

[inventor]

"The gain in kinetic energy resulting from the increased linear velocity in the throat is offset (i.e., balanced) by the decrease of pressure in the throat. The reduction in pressure which occurs when the fluid flows through the throat is called the Venturi effect and is named after the Italian physicist Giovanni Battista Venturi (1746 - 1822) who first observed the effect."

http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Venturi_effect
http://www.hippocampus.org/homework-help/Physics-B/Fluid%20Mechanics_Venturi%20Tube%20-%20Simulation.html



Andrew : D

[inventor]

[quote name='Feliks' date='Nov 1 2010, 21:41' post='4681451']
It is proposed to be called Venturi widmill: " The Cube Turbine "

Do you know that such a large cooling towers at power plants are made of reinforced concrete walls with a thickness of 12 cm on average?

I'm very curious if that work well, though for that tip wentturi Inject and burn some fuel.
The calculations on the calculator Venturi, that, if the temperature of the air flow would be about 60 degrees Kelvin higher, the speed of the jet that increased by 50% !

If this is not too much to add, that was such a low temperature turbine engine
During low-wind, he could give a little energy.
It was like a ramjet engine

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramjet

http://www.muzeumlotnictwa.pl/zbiory_sz.php?ido=72&w=a

Well, such a complete install on the mountain. Would give as much energy as the whole of Poland produces.
http://www.meteogroup.pl/pl/home/pogoda/pogoda-na-swiecie/pogoda-lokalna/miasto/12510

Regards Andrew :smoking: :smoking:
[/quote]

in other forum :

author=AdeV link=sujet=4938.msg55663#msg55663 date=1305841944


It occurs to me that if one poured petrol into the ground-level fan, and put a spark-plug in the tail pipe of the nozzle, then the mountain could - finally - come to Mohammed...

Andrew

[inventor]

I wonder if that fly?



Andrew

[inventor]

Lesson Two: in terms of fundamental historical

[url="http://www.new4stroke.com/Venturitubes1937.pdf"]Venturitubes 1937.pdf[/url]

On the pictures below you can see how small the venturi nozzle is to drive the gyroscopes in the strands. My finger and applied on the next hand, illustrate the size of the venturi tube. It is almost equal to the diameter of my finger. Now, please imagine how much energy to give the fan with the same diameter of my finger...








Since the narrowest point of the venturi tube, we can easily get up to 10 times higher air velocity, we can mount the engine behind the jet frame, which at high speeds the inlet has a good performance.
For example, you can mount an engine on an Tourist Plane, which reaches 200 km / h at the entrance to the RAM JET would be about 2000 km / h....
This will generate additional good sequence, using a very simple engine ( or two )




Regards Andrew

[inventor]

Originally posted by Feliks


On the pictures below you can see how small the venturi nozzle is to drive the gyroscopes in the strands. My finger and applied on the next hand, illustrate the size of the venturi tube. It is almost equal to the diameter of my finger. Now, please imagine how much energy to give the fan with the same diameter of my finger...


Regards Andrew

A venturi tube so small as my finger is able to propel a large heavy rotating disk gyroscope air to 10 000 RPM, and even walk through the air filter....





Since the gyroscope can be power, relatively high compared to the diameter of the venturi tubes (1 ") and he has the 2 ", then maybe you can do in F1 KERS Venturi "?
The air sucked into the engine can be sucked through a venturi tube so, resulting in a negative pressure to drive the gyroscope, which will keep energy....:tsk

That would be something like a turbine gives energy, but the intake pipe. Turbo



Regards Andrew

[inventor]

http://www.pilotfriend.com/training/flight_training/fxd_wing/gyro.htm

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/1982636.pdf

Andrew

[inventor]

Another animation:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tz2rQvCxp44

Regards Andrew

[inventor]

Originally posted by monkeysandbearspants
Having digested the content of the thread i conclude that the answer could be one of these !!

However weight may be an issue and mostly certainly there would need to to be some boot modifications!

http://www.full-ahead.net/Silownia/silniki_pomocnicze/sp_index_ang.htm

http://www.full-ahead.net/Silownia/silniki_pomocnicze/remont_sp/awarie_remont/glowica_urw_zaw_isadora/glow_urw_zawor.htm

http://www.full-ahead.net/Silownia/silniki_glowne/sg_index_ang.htm

double bottom fo foam
http://www.youtube.com/user/pawielus?gl=PL&hl=pl#p/u/53/Cfp0BWKwdgY dno


large swimmer:
http://www.youtube.com/user/pawielus?gl=PL&hl=pl#p/u/92/mnxWu3oWghs

Regards Andrew

[inventor]

Good opportunity to remind.

And about half rotate.




Star engines were characterized biggest always force density





Below picture of the star half rotate around 10 (40) with "cylinders". for the transparency of the picture one can see only 3 additional "cylinders" more than is at the animated film.
One can also see dimensions of the whole of the engine in the assumption that every cylinder has such dimensions for the picture half rotate with the set connecting rod of the Sulzer D= engine of 900 mm and stroke 2500 mm .



So 10 (40) "cylindrical" engine half rotate about the same working capacity in comparing to the Sulzer 10 engine cylindrical on the picture below .

Sulzer: 10 Cylinders 20 m long , 15 m hight , 1500 Ton weight

Half rotate star : 10(40) "Cylinders" 4,5 m diameter , 4,5 m long
about 70 ton weight.





And most importantly.. Since in the engine half rotate mass innertia are several times Sulzer smaller than in the engine, engine half rotate can work with the much greater rotation speed.
Slzer : 102 RPM 60 000 KW

Half rotate 250 RPM 150 000 KW

In same intake work volume .

Regards Andrew

Sure the engines of cars will be similar proportions